A recent research project/idea required me to look into setting up a NAT-to-NAT VPN. The basic idea being that two NATed networks are able to communicate through a VPN and share resources. While researching possible VPN solutions, I remembered reading about WireGuard a new VPN that aims to be fast, secure and lightweight. This seemed like the perfect opportunity to both try out a new VPN implementation and accomplish the goals of the research project.
The basic idea was to connect to NATed environments, this meant neither of the environments had a [static] public IP address, and I required an intermediate server to act as a gateway.
I further required resource sharing to be limited, where NAT-A was able to access resources in NAT-B but NAT-B wasn’t able to access the resources hosted in NAT-A. Setup also needed to be fast, lightweight and possible through a service script.
This resulted in the basic design was as follows:
For the VPN I used a private network range, which is usually unassigned, while both NATed networks had their own internal network ranges.
- VPN: 188.8.131.52/24
- NAT-A: 192.168.1.0/24
- NAT-B: 10.4.0.0/24
NAT-A needed a route for all traffic destined to 10.4.0.0/24 to be set to send traffic through the VPN, while NAT-B could not access the NAT-A network range.
WireGuard proved simple to setup in all my test environments. The intermediate/gateway server was an Ubuntu 16.04 server hosted in DigitalOcean. While NAT-A was my local Fedora 25 host and the NAT-B host was an Ubuntu 16.04 Cloud Image (I wanted to have cloud-init support). I’m not going to go into the installation of WireGuard here, the details are available on the offical site.
The first component that needed to be configured was the actual VPN and getting NAT-A and NAT-B to communicate.
I’ll use the following VARIABLES in the commands below, simply replace them with the correct values:
- SERVERPUB :
cat publickeyon the VPN server after using
- NATAPUB :
cat publickeyon NAT-A host
- NATBPUB :
cat publickeyon NAT-B host
Gateway server setup:
Ensure IP forwarding is enabled:
sysctl -w net.ipv4.ip_forward=1
And setup the VPN:
wg genkey | tee privatekey | wg pubkey > publickey ip link add dev wg0 type wireguard ip address add dev wg0 184.108.40.206/24 wg set wg0 private-key privatekey listen-port 12000 ip link set up dev wg0
NAT-A VPN setup:
wg genkey | tee privatekey | wg pubkey > publickey ip link add dev wg0 type wireguard ip address add dev wg0 220.127.116.11/24 wg set wg0 private-key privatekey peer SERVERPUB allowed-ips 18.104.22.168/24 endpoint vpn.server.com:12000 persistent-keepalive 10 ip link set up dev wg0
NAT-B VPN setup:
wg genkey | tee privatekey | wg pubkey > publickey ip link add dev wg0 type wireguard ip address add dev wg0 22.214.171.124/24 wg set wg0 private-key privatekey peer SERVERPUB allowed-ips 126.96.36.199/24 endpoint vpn.server.com:12000 persistent-keepalive 10 ip link set up dev wg0
This setups up our VPN and allows the NAT-A and NAT-B hosts to communicate through the 188.8.131.52/24 network. At this point it’s not possible to share resources.
Now that the two NATs are able to communicate, it’s time to setup the sharing of resources. Remember that NAT-A should access NAT-B resources, but not the other way around.
To allow forwarding of the traffic by our gateway server, a few changes need to be made. Firstly the new Peering information needs to be enabled in WireGuard, so that WireGuard knows to tag and encrypt the correct values.
wg set wg0 peer NATAPUB allowed-ips 184.108.40.206/32,0.0.0.0/24 wg set wg0 peer NATBPUB allowed-ips 220.127.116.11/32,10.4.0.0/24
Some iptables foo needs to be applied to allow forwarding of traffic through the gateway. A new route is added for our NAT-B range that needs to be accessible.
ip route add 10.4.0.0/24 dev wg0 iptables -A FORWARD -i wg0 -j ACCEPT iptables -A FORWARD -o wg0 -j ACCEPT iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o wg0 -j MASQUERADE
Next NAT-A needs to be setup to correctly route traffic for the resources in NAT-B.
For this, the WireGuard peer information is updated and a new route is added.
wg set wg0 private-key privatekey peer SERVERPUB allowed-ips 0.0.0.0/0 endpoint vpn.server.com:12000 persistent-keepalive 25 ip route add 10.4.0.0/24 via 18.104.22.168 dev wg0
Finally, the NAT-B host needs to be updated to be able to forward traffic to the resources inside it’s LAN.
sysctl -w net.ipv4.ip_forward=1 iptables -A FORWARD -i wg0 -j ACCEPT iptables -A FORWARD -o wg0 -j ACCEPT iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o wg0 -j MASQUERADE iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o ens3 -j MASQUERADE
At this point it should be possible for the NAT-A host to access resources inside NAT-B. Any requests for addresses in the 10.4.0.0/24 range will be routed through the VPN, forwarded by the gateway server to NAT-B, which will then forward to hosts inside the LAN.
For my tests I needed to be able to make certain ports from the NAT-A host accessible to hosts within NAT-B. More specifically, I needed host 10.4.0.10 to spawn a reverse shell, without knowing the IP address of NAT-A. For this, I forwared a port range on the NAT-B host to our NAT-A host;
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i ens3 -p tcp --dport 4000:5000 -j DNAT --to 22.214.171.124:4000-5000
As a service
Turning this into a service on NAT-B so that the VPN would come up automatically at boot was also needed and straight forward to implement. The iptables rules were saved and restored using iptables-save.
For the VPN service a systemd unit file was created:
[Unit] Description=Starts the wireguard VPN After=network-online.target [Service] ExecStart=/opt/wireguard/vpnup [Install] WantedBy=default.target
And the vpnup script in
/opt/wireguard looked as follows:
#!/bin/sh - SERVERPUB="$(cat /opt/wireguard/serverpub)" SERVER="$(cat /opt/wireguard/serverhostname)" PRIVATEKEY="/opt/wireguard/privatekey" ip link del dev wg0 ip link add dev wg0 type wireguard ip address add dev wg0 126.96.36.199/24 wg set wg0 private-key $PRIVATEKEY peer $SERVERPUB allowed-ips 188.8.131.52/24,10.4.0.0/24 endpoint $SERVER persistent-keepalive 10 ip link set up dev wg0